Power Hungry Performance Forum

Power Hungry Performance Forum (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/forum/index.php)
-   The Conversation Pit (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Ford's on Top! (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/forum/showthread.php?t=89)

Jackpine Tue, December 16th, 2008 06:21 PM

Ford's on Top!
 
Am I the only one who is happy that Ford seems to be weathering this financial storm better than Brand X and Brand Y? I was also interested to see an article on the internet that said sales of the F150 were down due to the downturn in the home building market (contractors like these vehicles, it seems) and that they expect sales to pick up if the housing market ever recovers.

But, all this goes for naught if the Senators that are trying to block assistance to the Big 3 have their way. In part, it seems these Southern gentlemen of the Republican persuasion have a big interest in seeing some foreign owned car makers, who have plants in their states, succeed. Is this truly what it means to be "patriotic", or "American"? :notallthere:

These guys clearly don't have the "big picture" in mind. Bailout Wall Street, pump more billions into Iraq to support Halliburton, but forget the "working American" (as long as he's not "Southern"). :bsflag:

We Ford owners DO have a voice! You might consider letting your Congressman hear from you. :stormcloud:

OK, now I can get off my :soapbox:

- Jack

ChuckD Tue, December 16th, 2008 08:42 PM

Ford got smart and sold off some of the brands that is had prior to the big down turn. Honda is out of F1 for a savings of 600 mil a year. It was the unions that braught them down. I mean why pay a person $32 an hour to sit and do nothing.

johnnyd Tue, December 16th, 2008 09:19 PM

We (home builder) had 5 Fords and just recently sold the work horse of the bunch, 02' F250 v10 Lariat loaded with a 10' Western plow set up for 13k. It only had 68k on it. 3 Heritage models, a 02 and two 04's which now must go. We'll keep the E250.

Hopefully things will turn around and we can go back to supporting our local Ford store.

But yes, I too am happy to hear Ford is weathering the storm.

Power Hungry Tue, December 16th, 2008 09:35 PM

It still annoys the heck out of me that major corporations can go to the government with their hands out and get aid, meanwhile people are losing their homes because they've been laid off by the same bailed out institutions and can't pay the mortgage.

There is something seriously wrong with the financial management of this country, and it doesn't matter who is President, who is in the Senate or who is in Congress. Personal agendas are everywhere and those with power and access use it and abuse it to further their own interests.

I, too, will get of the soapbox now.


Glad Ford looks to be surviving. With the new powertrain lineups for 2010, they'll hopefully maintain their foothold.

Corey Cohron RIP Tue, December 16th, 2008 09:46 PM

Where's Ross Perot when you need him? :2thumbs:

Damn, I'm old. :oldlady: :hehe:

Northern Supercrew Tue, December 16th, 2008 09:50 PM

i was watching the news up here today and if the big 3 go down...that equates into 582,000 canadian jobs too. i couldn't imagine how many more U.S. jobs. Ford seems to have a good business plan for the future...hopefully the new Ecoboost engine coming around '10 will be a hit.

Jackpine Tue, December 16th, 2008 10:51 PM

Bill, maybe the answer is that we DON'T get off the soapbox.

Deep down inside, I DO think our elected officials listen to us IF we make enough noise. (As Janet is fond of quoting, "The squeaky wheel gets the grease").

The trouble is, this whole financial mess is so interrelated. You can't have manufacturing without banks. Workers ARE entitled to decent wages, based on their skills and knowledge and unions have helped them achieve that. Government HAS to subsidize promising technology, or it never advances past the "promise" stage.

Possibly, just possibly, we in America have become too used to an inflated standard of living. Should we all accept the "China model"? What is it, about $300/month and NO benefits?

Really, we simply (and it's not so simple) need to learn how to compete/coexist in a global economy. And, it's getting more and more global every day.

I, for one, appreciate your business model, which seems to be: "Give value to our customers, who are our friends".

I don't think I'm alone in my appreciation.

- Jack :margarita: :margarita: :margarita:

Power Hungry Tue, December 16th, 2008 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackandJanet (Post 373)
I, for one, appreciate your business model, which seems to be: "Give value to our customers, who are our friends".

I don't think I'm alone in my appreciation.

- Jack :margarita: :margarita: :margarita:

I'll drink to that! :shots: :2thumbs:

johnnyd Thu, December 18th, 2008 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackandJanet (Post 373)
Bill, maybe the answer is that we DON'T get off the soapbox.

Deep down inside, I DO think our elected officials listen to us IF we make enough noise. (As Janet is fond of quoting, "The squeaky wheel gets the grease").

The trouble is, this whole financial mess is so interrelated. You can't have manufacturing without banks. Workers ARE entitled to decent wages, based on their skills and knowledge and unions have helped them achieve that. Government HAS to subsidize promising technology, or it never advances past the "promise" stage.

Possibly, just possibly, we in America have become too used to an inflated standard of living. Should we all accept the "China model"? What is it, about $300/month and NO benefits?

Really, we simply (and it's not so simple) need to learn how to compete/coexist in a global economy. And, it's getting more and more global every day.

I, for one, appreciate your business model, which seems to be: "Give value to our customers, who are our friends".

I don't think I'm alone in my appreciation.

- Jack :margarita: :margarita: :margarita:

Unions have helped them get a descent wage for their skills? Are you serious? Help me understand the skills that they brought to the table when they where hired in and the value of those skills. In what ways did these skills help the company? :confused:

Jackpine Thu, December 18th, 2008 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyd (Post 411)
Unions have helped them get a descent wage for their skills? Are you serious? Help me understand the skills that they brought to the table when they where hired in and the value of those skills. In what ways did these skills help the company? :confused:

Ah - I don't think the auto companies hire workers that are proficient only in camel driving or cotton picking and who can't learn more. Somehow, I expect they want workers that know something about machining, assembly, finishing, electrical work, etc. These are the skills I was talking about. Perhaps the company even taught them those skills - far enough. Airlines train their pilots to fly the company's equipment. Doctors get continuation training. Mechanics get OJT. Same concept.

Once trained, as a mechanic, assembly line technician, pilot, doctor, lawyer, soldier, etc., you should be paid for what you bring to the job. IF not, well then, let ANYBODY do those jobs. Want to let Bubba, in East Overall Patches, MS, come in off the farm and jump into the pilot's seat for your next airline trip?

So, is everyone overpaid? Perhaps. Are you willing to take a pay cut?

Henry Ford shocked the auto industry when he started paying his workers $5+ an hour. Suddenly, they could afford to buy the cars they made. Everyone warned that would be the death of the auto industry. Did it happen? Shouldn't auto workers be able to afford to buy cars?

- Jack


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2020, Power Hungry Performance