View Single Post
  #7  
Old Thu, July 2nd, 2009, 10:22 PM
cleatus12r's Avatar
cleatus12r cleatus12r is offline
F Your Yankee Blue Jeans
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 3,063
cleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to all
Default

As far as a fix goes for your intake situation, the only way around the issue is to get an intake that won't set the codes.

Here is the problem.....


When the Ford engineers designed the intake tract on the truck, the mass airflow sensor was installed and mapped to IT. Air has mass. Any bends, restrictions, turbulence, etc. will cause a DIFFERENT mass airflow volume reading than what the factory air intake has. For instance, if the MAF sensor is placed on the outside edge of a curve in the duct work then the reading from the sensor will measure higher than if the sensor was placed in the inside edge since most of the airflow is forced to the outside edge of the curve.

Ford (as well as Dodge and GM) requires that a KNOWN airflow through the engine be monitored to measure the effectiveness of the EGR system and the particulate filter restriction model. Any time the values are skewed and not within the specified parameters for a given RPM, load, temperature, etc. then a code is going to set.

Sorry about this. The only way that Bill would be able to "fix" the problem is to have the exact Ford airflow specifications and calibrate the MAF sensor signal from the aftermarket intake to reflect what the PCM wants to see....or a lot of trial and error with MAF sensor placement in the tube that closely mimics the factory piece.
__________________
Tuning, flashing, burning chips, and repairing all aspects of 7.3L Powerstrokes.
SEVEN 7.3L-powered vehicles in the driveway. Two didn't come that way from the factory!
Reply With Quote