Power Hungry Performance Forum  

Go Back   Power Hungry Performance Forum > Power Hungry Performance Product Information > Gryphon Programmer

Gryphon Programmer Edge Product has discontinued the Edge Evolution 2, but we still provide support and tuning for it.

If you have a question or comment relating the Gryphon (or Evolution) programmer, post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old Fri, February 12th, 2010, 02:55 PM
06FX41992's Avatar
06FX41992 06FX41992 is offline
Whopper Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 3
06FX41992 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PZX_2002 View Post
Here is a test that I have done time and time again so this is accurate on my truck.
These are the readings I logged with the canned Gryph 87 tow tune:
message center = 12.0 mpg's
Gryphon = 14.5mpg's

So when it states 12.0mpg's it is really 10.7 using "good-o'l-fashion" tools, pen n paper. The message center on my pickup is off by -1.3 mpg's and as for the gryphon, I could not count that high.



2007 F150 SCrew
stock 4x4
Thats how it is for me too, only I don't have the message center readout. My Gryphon is reading 12.5-13.5 and when I do it by hand I get around 9.5-10.5. Its kinda frustrating, but most of the frustration is from the gas mileage itself. I guess 35 inch tires and a steel replacement bumper might have something to do it... Oh, ya, and a heavy right foot...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Sat, February 13th, 2010, 03:16 AM
Power Hungry's Avatar
Power Hungry Power Hungry is offline
The Godfather of Power Stroke Tuning
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 2,459
Power Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud of
Default

One of the problems is that when the calculations for economy were written, it was for straight gasoline. Now with 10% ethanol blends being more prevalent, this changes things considerably as far as MPG predictions go but the algorithms have never been updated. The readings used to be considerably more accurate a few years back. I guess I'll have to revisit them and make some adjustments.
__________________
Bill Cohron - The Mad Doctor

Power Hungry Performance - The ORIGINAL in Ford performance tuning... Since 1996!
(678) 890-1110

www.gopowerhungry.com - Home of the Hydra Chip, Minotaur Tuning Software, and the new Orion Reflash System for Navistar!

Bring back Windows™ XP and 7.
Windows™ Vista and Windows™ 8 is a pain in my a$$!
Windows™ 10 is only slightly less annoying!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Sat, February 13th, 2010, 06:43 PM
Jackpine's Avatar
Jackpine Jackpine is offline
PHP Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Among Elk, Deer and Javalinas on the Mogollon Rim in Aridzona
Posts: 4,329
Jackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Hungry View Post
One of the problems is that when the calculations for economy were written, it was for straight gasoline. Now with 10% ethanol blends being more prevalent, this changes things considerably as far as MPG predictions go but the algorithms have never been updated. The readings used to be considerably more accurate a few years back. I guess I'll have to revisit them and make some adjustments.
Now THAT makes sense to me! Thanks, Bill.

- Jack
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2020, Power Hungry Performance