Power Hungry Performance Forum  

Go Back   Power Hungry Performance Forum > Ford F-150, Expedition, Navigator, Blackwood, Mark-LT, SVT Lightning and H-D Editions > 2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT

2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT 4.2L, 4.6L and 5.4L equipped F-150s and Mark-LTs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old Wed, March 18th, 2009, 04:08 PM
Power Hungry's Avatar
Power Hungry Power Hungry is offline
The Godfather of Power Stroke Tuning
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 2,458
Power Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud of
Default

Can't wait to see the results, Jim! I think a lot of people are really curious about what works and what doesn't.

__________________
Bill Cohron - The Mad Doctor

Power Hungry Performance - The ORIGINAL in Ford performance tuning... Since 1996!
(678) 890-1110

www.gopowerhungry.com - Home of the Hydra Chip, Minotaur Tuning Software, and the new Orion Reflash System for Navistar!

Bring back Windows™ XP and 7.
Windows™ Vista and Windows™ 8 is a pain in my a$$!
Windows™ 10 is only slightly less annoying!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Wed, March 18th, 2009, 04:15 PM
jimmyv13 jimmyv13 is offline
Triple Whopper with Cheese
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 117
jimmyv13 is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm going to do this regardless...but it would be nice to know the actual numbers.

Good work!!!!
__________________
2005 F-250 CC Lariat 6.0L

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Wed, March 18th, 2009, 09:47 PM
Jackpine's Avatar
Jackpine Jackpine is offline
PHP Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Among Elk, Deer and Javalinas on the Mogollon Rim in Aridzona
Posts: 4,328
Jackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to all
Default

I'm especially interested now after my "back and forth" with the other member of the f150online forum.

However, I've just returned from an approximately 1400 mile trip to the sunny beaches in Southern California, and I have to say, the truck ran beautifully, climbed the grade out of Indio without effort, just cruised along like it was under no stress at all.

- Jack
__________________

2014 F150 Platinum SCrew 3.5L EcoBoost 4x4 with SCT programmer

Last edited by Jackpine; Sat, March 21st, 2009 at 09:45 PM. Reason: Changed mileage to "approximate"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Sat, March 21st, 2009, 07:37 PM
way2qk4u2c way2qk4u2c is offline
Ford F150 FX4
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 61
way2qk4u2c is on a distinguished road
Default

no results yet lol im anxious
__________________
2006 F-150 FX4 Dark Shadow Grey
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Sat, March 21st, 2009, 09:41 PM
Jackpine's Avatar
Jackpine Jackpine is offline
PHP Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Among Elk, Deer and Javalinas on the Mogollon Rim in Aridzona
Posts: 4,328
Jackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to all
Default

Me too. But, after our 1326.6 mile, 86.005 gallons of gas trip to and from California, using the homemade CAI and Bill's custom "economy" (non-towing) tune, I can report that I averaged 15.425 MPG for the entire trip. And, I was fighting a headwind for the trip into California. On the way back, the air was calm (half the wind generators in Palm Springs were shut down).

What makes this number significant though, is that before this, I've only seen 15.5 MPG in the 55-60 mph range in calm winds. Any speed faster brought my mileage down into the 14 MPG range. On this trip, we had five people in the truck, it was full of luggage, toys and food, and I was operating in the 70-75 mph range.

So, was this a result of Bill's outstanding tune, my CAI mod or perhaps a bit of both? I really had not had a chance to check this tune on a long trip before this, so I don't have a good base point for comparison.

All I know is, the truck's running better than ever!

- Jack
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old Sat, March 21st, 2009, 09:48 PM
jimmyv13 jimmyv13 is offline
Triple Whopper with Cheese
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Posts: 117
jimmyv13 is on a distinguished road
Default

Sounds great...about 1.5MPG increase WITH the 15-20MPH increase. Can't complain about that. Anytime you can go faster AND use less fuel is impressive.

I did the mod this evening, but won't drive the truck until the morning. My Gryphon is shipping out Monday, hopefully, from PHP and will be installed the day it arrives.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Sat, March 21st, 2009, 10:50 PM
SinCityFX4 SinCityFX4 is offline
Member in Sin
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sin City
Posts: 224
SinCityFX4 is on a distinguished road
Default

Sweet
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Sun, March 22nd, 2009, 06:31 AM
kd4crs's Avatar
kd4crs kd4crs is offline
Not a Whopper
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central KY
Posts: 82
kd4crs is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JackandJanet View Post
Me too. But, after our 1326.6 mile, 86.005 gallons of gas trip to and from California, using the homemade CAI and Bill's custom "economy" (non-towing) tune, I can report that I averaged 15.425 MPG for the entire trip. And, I was fighting a headwind for the trip into California. On the way back, the air was calm (half the wind generators in Palm Springs were shut down).

What makes this number significant though, is that before this, I've only seen 15.5 MPG in the 55-60 mph range in calm winds. Any speed faster brought my mileage down into the 14 MPG range. On this trip, we had five people in the truck, it was full of luggage, toys and food, and I was operating in the 70-75 mph range.

So, was this a result of Bill's outstanding tune, my CAI mod or perhaps a bit of both? I really had not had a chance to check this tune on a long trip before this, so I don't have a good base point for comparison.

All I know is, the truck's running better than ever!

- Jack
So far on our trip to Florida I am running the canned level 2 tune and the Gryphon is reporting 17.3 MPG! Last fill-up I did the math and it came out to 17.2, so I am happy. That is with 3 people, 1 dog, and truck full of luggage going 75 MPH.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Sun, March 22nd, 2009, 04:47 PM
incogmeo's Avatar
incogmeo incogmeo is offline
Whopper Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 3
incogmeo is on a distinguished road
Default

From another website .... "The 2004s and early 2005s were known to come from the factory in a near lean condition. Any increase at all was enough to lean them out further. Troyer did some dynoing a long time ago and posted the results. Any additional air on these should be done with care and preferrably with custom tunes."

So my questions are:

1. Is this true ?

2. Is it safe to do the air intake mod to a stock 04 5.4 with a K&N drop in filter and no tuner ?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Sun, March 22nd, 2009, 05:22 PM
Jackpine's Avatar
Jackpine Jackpine is offline
PHP Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Among Elk, Deer and Javalinas on the Mogollon Rim in Aridzona
Posts: 4,328
Jackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by incogmeo View Post
From another website .... "The 2004s and early 2005s were known to come from the factory in a near lean condition. Any increase at all was enough to lean them out further. Troyer did some dynoing a long time ago and posted the results. Any additional air on these should be done with care and preferrably with custom tunes."

So my questions are:

1. Is this true ?

2. Is it safe to do the air intake mod to a stock 04 5.4 with a K&N drop in filter and no tuner ?

Thanks.
It IS true, but Bill addressed this issue several times. As long as you don't change the environment around the MAF sensor (It's a little thing that sticks out of the driver's side of the intake ducting above and behind the air filter box - there's electrical wires running to it) you won't get a lean condition. The K&N filter is just a filter - it doesn't change the airflow pattern. The homemade CAI is a change way up at the snorkel - it doesn't change the MAF sensor environment either.

So, Bill feels it is safe. I do too.

If you look at the commercial CAI's you'll see they completely replace the ducting all the way to the throttle body. This is a major change to the flow around the sensor and, according to Bill, it really can't see the additional airflow, so, the engine runs lean.

Hope this makes sense.

- Jack
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2020, Power Hungry Performance