Power Hungry Performance Forum

Power Hungry Performance Forum (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/index.php)
-   The Conversation Pit (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   A Political Statement (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/showthread.php?t=639)

ChuckD Sat, March 7th, 2009 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackandJanet (Post 5259)
Yes - excellent point! The new elected official comes in has to take a while being non-productive while he learns things, then, he has to "reinvent the wheel", since he doesn't know why his idea didn't work before and finally, when things don't work out, the career people put everything back the way it was. (And 2 or 4 more years have gone by).

We have some of that problem in the active duty military. And it was recognized as it pertained to units deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. A decision was made to not rotate personnel in and out of units to minimize this effect.

Non-active duty units like the Guard and the Reserve, do better here I think. They have a true "corporate memory" that really makes them more efficient as a unit than active duty units.

- Jack

Not sure if I would agree with that. When we got deployed they took everybody in the state that hadn't deployed and a list of volunteers and put them in a unit that been disbanded. There was alot of people that had never met each other, much less worked together.

Jackpine Sat, March 7th, 2009 04:25 PM

Ouch, that's not good! I was thinking more of a Guard unit deploying AS a unit. Not being combined with anyone else.

- Jack

ChuckD Sat, March 7th, 2009 05:15 PM

For the most part they do. But, there is always a but, when the federal side says you will give me a unit and pretty much all your units have been deployed this is a way to send the ones that hasn't been before. I have seen units made up from people from different states.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 AM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2024, Power Hungry Performance