Power Hungry Performance Forum

Power Hungry Performance Forum (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/index.php)
-   Gryphon Programmer (Disabled) (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Variance between Gryphon and actual milage (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/showthread.php?t=1437)

p40whk Wed, July 15th, 2009 03:26 PM

Variance between Gryphon and actual milage
 
I've always been in the habit of checking my mileage whenever I fill up my tank and just got my Gryphon programmer a couple of weeks ago and am using the average and instant economy screens. I have noticed that the average economy for my Gryphon reads almost 2 MPG higher than what I actually get by dividing total gallons used by miles driven. I've run

I don't have any custom tunes yet so I'm running the canned 87 tow tune since I have an AFE CAI. My truck originally came with 235/70-17 tires and I just replaced them with 255/65-17 which is an option OEM size.

I am wondering if I need to set the tire size in my Gryphon or if my odometer is not displaying correctly. I've run 4 tanks though the truck and the results are pretty consistent.

Any suggestions?

Jackpine Wed, July 15th, 2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p40whk (Post 12135)
I've always been in the habit of checking my mileage whenever I fill up my tank and just got my Gryphon programmer a couple of weeks ago and am using the average and instant economy screens. I have noticed that the average economy for my Gryphon reads almost 2 MPG higher than what I actually get by dividing total gallons used by miles driven. I've run

I don't have any custom tunes yet so I'm running the canned 87 tow tune since I have an AFE CAI. My truck originally came with 235/70-17 tires and I just replaced them with 255/65-17 which is an option OEM size.

I am wondering if I need to set the tire size in my Gryphon or if my odometer is not displaying correctly. I've run 4 tanks though the truck and the results are pretty consistent.

Any suggestions?

Those tires are almost identical in terms of circumference, so I doubt you're going to see much effect by changing the tire size. Your old tires were about 2317mm around (subtracting 3% for squish) and the new ones are 2324mm at the same squish. That gives you only two revolutions less per mile. However, I WOULD use the Custom Options menu and set this new figure in anyway.

Before you do, please take the time to read my Q & A on the Custom Options menu so you won't be confused by the numbers you will see for Tire Size and maybe Gear Ratio. Make sure both values are entered correctly.

Now, back to the difference between the Gryphon and a hand calculation. I actually get about the same results as you do. The Gryphon always reads higher than what I am actually getting. I don't bother to monitor the Avg Economy for that reason. If you do though, DO not reset it at each fillup. It takes about 100,000 seconds of operation to "level" out and that corresponds to several tanks of gas. So, it will always be VERY inaccurate just after a reset. You'll probably find that you tend to have a fairly consistent error, and you can just "mentally" adjust for it.

- Jack

88Racing Wed, July 15th, 2009 06:32 PM

Running the canned tunes mine was off by about 1.5+--2.0+ mpg. With the customs more like 0.5+--0.75+ mpg.

Lars

p40whk Thu, July 16th, 2009 09:27 AM

Thanks for the quick replies, I'll add the circumferences tonight.

I wasn't sure what was more accurate since my speed on the Gryphon reads about 3 mph slower than what my dash needle shows. I would imagine the Gryphon is what's accurate since I regularly go by police with my truck in cruise control set 9 over and have never been pulled over. When my Gryphon shows me going 79 my dash gauge says I'm doing 82. Since the readings are coming from the computer and not converting the speed to an anolog gauge I am assuming that the Gryphon is more accurate. I hope I'm right! Otherwise I may get pulled over real soon! :evillol:

88Racing Thu, July 16th, 2009 10:39 AM

Your needle on the dash will always read 1+--2+ higher than what a gps or gryphon will read out. That's with a correct value for the tires in the gryphon. Some weird thing Ford did?

Lars

Savagetwelve Thu, July 16th, 2009 09:28 PM

I have a quick question:

on the Gear Ratio Calculator in Pegasus what does Squish reffer to?
I am running 285/55R20's so how much Squish is that?

Does anyone what stock Gear Ratio was on the 04F150 STX? How would I find that info?

p40whk Thu, July 16th, 2009 10:20 PM

I just assumed squish was the weight of the truck pushing down and flattening out (squishing) the tire. But, you know what happens when you assume.

You should be able to find the gear ratio on the dataplate inside the door frame. I think :shrug:

Jackpine Thu, July 16th, 2009 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savagetwelve (Post 12227)
I have a quick question:

on the Gear Ratio Calculator in Pegasus what does Squish reffer to?
I am running 285/55R20's so how much Squish is that?

Does anyone what stock Gear Ratio was on the 04F150 STX? How would I find that info?

In the gear ratio calculator, "squish" refers to the "flattening" of the rubber tire under the weight of the vehicle. The metal wheel does not deform, but, the rubber part does. So, if the "squish" value is 5%, the distance between the rim and the ground is reduced by 5%. That's a constant value as the tire rolls, so the distance between the axle and the ground (the rolling wheel radius) is reduced by that much tire deformation all the time. Ford uses this 5% rubber deformation value when they calculate the number of revolutions your axle makes per mile on stock tires (according to Bill). I've found, for my tires, that a 7% squish value in the calculator makes the Gryphon speedo dead accurate. Other people have found it works for them too.

But, here's where it gets tricky. You can "pretend" that the entire wheel-tire combination compresses under the weight of the vehicle to simplify calculations. So if the zero-squish radius to the edge of the tire is 32", then using a 7% reduction in the rubber part is about the same as a 3% reduction in the 32" value. And, if the zero-squish tire circumference is 2559mm (my tires) then subtracting 3% (about 77mm) gives 2482mm - almost exactly what the calculator gives at 7% rubber squish (it says 2480mm).

What I'm getting to in all this, is, if you know the "unloaded" circumference of your inflated tire, you can subtract about 3% for squish and you'll be very close.

Going back to your question though, if I were you, I'd change the "squish" value in the calculator to 7% and use the resulting 2511mm value for the Tire Size in the Custom Options Menu. (I tend to be long-winded, don't I?)

For the stock Gear Ratio, look at the sticker on the driver's side door. Near the bottom, you'll see the word "Axle" and below that, you'll see a "code". Mine is "B6", but yours could be two numbers. I did a quick internet search and found this for F150s and F250s:

Axle Codes (LS=Limited Slip / Traction Lok):

F-150:
19 – 3.55 Non-LS
18 – 3.08 Non-LS
H9 – 3.55 LS
B6 – 3.73 LS

F-250:
27 – 3.31 Non-LS
26 – 3.73 Non-LS
Hope all this makes sense!

- Jack

Savagetwelve Thu, July 16th, 2009 11:40 PM

Jack it some worlds it does make sense! Thanks for that lond detailed explaination!
I guess you just have to play with that squish # untill you get it right!
What are you comparing the Gryphon to? The speedo?:confused:

I am running LT tires would that mean they are less squishy? Therefore less of a % (eg. 1-2) making Squishy 8-9%
The calculation in the user manual does not account for the squishy?
( I just like uing the word squishy! )

W/O the squishy I calculate manually 285/55R20: 2581mm :thumbs up yellow::thumbsdwn:

I guess this will have to be my starting point!

88Racing Thu, July 16th, 2009 11:48 PM

Start out at 2500 and use a gps.

Lars

Savagetwelve Fri, July 17th, 2009 12:11 AM

Thanks Lars! That was short n sweet.... :cool_beans:

Jackpine Fri, July 17th, 2009 02:12 AM

Yea, Lars does have a tendency to reduce it all to "essentials" *boring*. :giggle:

His value is a good starting point, but I think mine is better! :evillol:

DO use a GPS if you have one. It will give you an accurate readout of your speed. Get the Gryphon to agree with it by changing your TS as needed. Your dash speedo will then read about 2 mph faster, because Ford set it that way.

I suspect LT tires may have less squish, so the circumference value could be larger. The user manual calculation assumes zero squish. If you enter that value, your TS will be too big.

- Jack

p40whk Fri, July 17th, 2009 11:59 AM

I checked mine with GPS this morning and the Gryphon is much more accurate than the Speedo.

At lunch today I went out to check the custom settings of my TS and GR and they were not set to what they should be. So, I reset them using the custom option. I'm using the 87 canned Tow tune until my performance tunes come in (have a CAI) but I got to thinking (since I don't have the manual handy) Do I need to revert to stock before I make custom changes or change the tune level? I couldn't find this in the Q&A's but thought I read somewhere that you should go back to the stock tune before changing to a Gryphon Tune.

I didn't do that in this case (haven't driven the truck yet) an am wondering if I need to reset it to stock then load the 87 Tow with the custom settings.

Jackpine Fri, July 17th, 2009 12:14 PM

No, you DO NOT have to return to stock before opening the Custom Options menu. But, you're not really going to be able to "check" things in that menu either unless the first thing you did was "Reload Previous Settings". Even then, your TS will probably be slightly different.

Do look again at the Q & A that I wrote for the Gryphon Custom Options menu. I think it will answer all your questions.

(I probably need to add the part about not having to return to stock though - thanks!)

- Jack

p40whk Fri, July 17th, 2009 04:08 PM

Thanks Jack,

I did read the Q&A's and understand that those fields are not populated by the PCM as values to be checked and that they are user entered values. I guess I should have clarified that in my post above and probably worded it differently. When I went into the custom menu for TS and GR there were numbers already in the fields that did not correspond to my setup. I think this is where a lot of people get confused thinking they can "Check" theirs.

Biggest problem with the written word is the interpretation. I've written aircraft maintenance manuals for over 20 years and no matter how hard I try to be clear, someone always reads my instructions differently than I intended.

Savagetwelve Sat, July 18th, 2009 01:32 AM

Ok I was able to try out your sugesstions today with a GPS.
I set the TS to 2500 (+/-10) to see how it compared to GPS.
I noticed on constant acceleration and cruise speed the GR was reading about 1 mph vs. GPS.
When I punched it I nitice that the GR was 5-10mph more that the GPS until I reached a constant speed where the GPS then caught up :confused:
Why would this happen? Is the GPS just that slow to pick up the change in speed?

Jackpine Sat, July 18th, 2009 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savagetwelve (Post 12289)
Ok I was able to try out your sugesstions today with a GPS.
I set the TS to 2500 (+/-10) to see how it compared to GPS.
I noticed on constant acceleration and cruise speed the GR was reading about 1 mph vs. GPS.
When I punched it I nitice that the GR was 5-10mph more that the GPS until I reached a constant speed where the GPS then caught up :confused:
Why would this happen? Is the GPS just that slow to pick up the change in speed?

I think you just nailed it! :thumbs up yellow: The GPS updates it's information at regular intervals, and I imagine it's not the same for different models. Then, the processor inside the GPS has to perform some calculations to display your speed, and that takes time too. I would not expect it to react to abrupt changes instantly.

I think my Garmin hiking GPS updates on one-second intervals, and it's far more precise than my Ford Magellan GPS because the map scale it works with is more exact.

- Jack

Jackpine Sat, July 18th, 2009 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p40whk (Post 12257)
Thanks Jack,

I did read the Q&A's and understand that those fields are not populated by the PCM as values to be checked and that they are user entered values. I guess I should have clarified that in my post above and probably worded it differently. When I went into the custom menu for TS and GR there were numbers already in the fields that did not correspond to my setup. I think this is where a lot of people get confused thinking they can "Check" theirs.

Biggest problem with the written word is the interpretation. I've written aircraft maintenance manuals for over 20 years and no matter how hard I try to be clear, someone always reads my instructions differently than I intended.

Yup! Those are "placeholder" values. And, since you've opened the Custom Options menu, those placeholder values are what will be loaded into your tune unless you change them manually or, "Load Previous Settings" (assuming you've manually entered correct values before).

If you've never used the Custom Options menu, there IS NO "Previous Settings" file to "Load"! A tune by itself does not create one.

I KNOW it's confusing! It took me at least six months to finally put all the pieces together.

I like your avatar! The P-40 was always one of my favorite WWII aircraft.

- Jack


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2024, Power Hungry Performance