Power Hungry Performance Forum  

Go Back   Power Hungry Performance Forum > Ford F-150, Expedition, Navigator, Blackwood, Mark-LT, SVT Lightning and H-D Editions (Disabled) > 2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT

2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT
4.2L, 4.6L and 5.4L equipped F-150s and Mark-LTs.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Sat, May 5th, 2012, 11:07 PM
NITEMARE07 NITEMARE07 is offline
Double Whopper
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 31
NITEMARE07 is on a distinguished road
Default

I guess what I'm trying to get to is which would produce more hp/tq? I've seen that the superchargers will put out on average 100 extra hp. Didnt know if anyone else on this forum has went the turbo route. If i went with turbo i would need two since i have true dual exhaust.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Sun, May 6th, 2012, 02:38 AM
cajunboy2208 cajunboy2208 is offline
Bacon King
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 81
cajunboy2208 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NITEMARE07 View Post
I guess what I'm trying to get to is which would produce more hp/tq? I've seen that the superchargers will put out on average 100 extra hp. Didnt know if anyone else on this forum has went the turbo route. If i went with turbo i would need two since i have true dual exhaust.
only 100hp? Would like to know what garbage supercharger that is... the whipple will do roughly 60% increase in hp

To answer in short without going into detail, which will give more hp? Turbo hands down
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Sun, May 6th, 2012, 07:21 AM
Power Hungry's Avatar
Power Hungry Power Hungry is offline
The Godfather of Power Stroke Tuning
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 2,271
Power Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud of
Default

Turbos tend to be more efficient in terms of output vs parasitic loss. Outside of that...

Turbocharger advantages:
Less expensive
Easier to maintain
Boost level controllable by wastegate

Supercharger advantages:
Linear power output
Easy to install

If I were to choose, I'd go turbo even though the systems are a little more complex. However, since you're running full duals it might be cost prohibitive to try to run a twin turbo setup. That's up to you, though.

Good luck with your decision.
__________________
Bill Cohron - The Mad Doctor

Power Hungry Performance - The ORIGINAL in Ford performance tuning... Since 1997!
(678) 890-1110

www.gopowerhungry.com - Home of the Hydra Chip, Minotaur Tuning Software, and the new Orion Reflash System for Navistar!

Bring back Windows™ XP and 7.
Windows™ Vista and Windows™ 8 is a pain in my a$$!
Windows™ 10 is only slightly less annoying!
Windows™ 11 is garbage!

Much to my surprise, I'm actually quite enjoying Linux!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Sun, May 6th, 2012, 01:52 PM
NITEMARE07 NITEMARE07 is offline
Double Whopper
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 31
NITEMARE07 is on a distinguished road
Default

So how much boost would be too much for a stock motor with twin turbo? I'm thinking somewhere in the neighborhood of 8 pounds. I like the idea of turbo because most guys run superchargers and of coarse that unmistakable whistle they produce. So even though superchargers put out 60% extra hp, turbos provide more! That would be some serious muscle.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 PM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2024, Power Hungry Performance