Thermostat ?

[88Racing]

Keep it "stock" @ 195 for optimum performance.

Lars

[BlackSTX]

I've recently swapped mine out for a 180 degree stat, so far so good. I know part of the reasoning for the manufacturers going to higher temps is emissions, I just don't like running a vehicle that hot, though I know it's engineered for it. It's possible that in the winter I may want to swap back to a 195 depending on how well it defrosts the windows in winter; but for now I'm happy.
The question I have is this something that may allow me to advance my timing a degree of two since the head temps are now a bit lower and will this help prevent pre-ignition to any usable amount? I guess, from a programming stand point, is there a benefit to having changed this?

[88Racing]

Originally Posted by BlackSTX

I've recently swapped mine out for a 180 degree stat, so far so good. I know part of the reasoning for the manufacturers going to higher temps is emissions, I just don't like running a vehicle that hot, though I know it's engineered for it. It's possible that in the winter I may want to swap back to a 195 depending on how well it defrosts the windows in winter; but for now I'm happy.
The question I have is this something that may allow me to advance my timing a degree of two since the head temps are now a bit lower and will this help prevent pre-ignition to any usable amount? I guess, from a programming stand point, is there a benefit to having changed this?

No, you may confuse the pcm and it may make the truck run richer. Thinking it is in a warm up mode all the time until it reaches the switch over to run temp.

Lars

[BlackSTX]

Originally Posted by 88Racing

No, you may confuse the pcm and it may make the truck run richer. Thinking it is in a warm up mode all the time until it reaches the switch over to run temp.

Lars

That was a concern I had, the old GM-OBD systems had a set temp before going into normal operating mode, if I recall correctly, it may have been around 165 degrees. I have been monitoring mileage, and so far it seems like it's consistent, though I'm sure temps doesn't have to be significant for the PCM to enrich the a/f mix. My only real concern is going too rich for the cats, since no one wants to have to replace a set of cats.

[Jackpine]

Originally Posted by BlackSTX

That was a concern I had, the old GM-OBD systems had a set temp before going into normal operating mode, if I recall correctly, it may have been around 165 degrees. I have been monitoring mileage, and so far it seems like it's consistent, though I'm sure temps doesn't have to be significant for the PCM to enrich the a/f mix. My only real concern is going too rich for the cats, since no one wants to have to replace a set of cats.

Yup - I forgot about the cats. They suffer too. You'll probably be operating open loop longer after a cold start. But again, once the thermostat is open and the coolant temperature stabilizes, you're really just about back where you started, except that if it's really cool out and you don't put much load on the engine, you might be running colder than you really want, since the "floor" is lower.

- Jack

[BlackSTX]

Either way, I can swap a 195 back in, it's simple enough. I guess some reasoning to this is that you used to be able to buy chips years ago designed for use with 180 stats. I believe they allowed for more aggressive timing, and hence, better performance. Of course, they also were programmed for such a change and I imagine made all other required adjustments accordingly.

I guess the other question that I now have is how does the temp. change affect under hood temps, and A/F ratios vs. the increased efficiency of the engine with CAI and exhaust mods. Does the lower temps, and possible richer mixture offset the possible leaning effects of the other mods? Also, how are the spark plugs (heat range) now effected by operating temperature changes? How much does the PCM compensate for the CAI alone; obviously, it does compensate for it some, at least enough to not burn up the engine or trip a SES light..... These are the questions some of the master techs I asked couldn't answer, though they aren't tuners/programmers so I didn't expect them to have an exact answer, they could only say that the PCM will compensate for an increased airflow, but didn't have know as to how much.

[BlackSTX]

Well, I did a little reading online, Looks like I may be changing back to the 195. According to what I read, it appears that the 195 may be better over all for performance and efficiency. Though I will admit, it seems kinda strange cause we always used cooler stats years ago; but that was long before they were putting computers in cars too.

[Jackpine]

Originally Posted by BlackSTX

I've recently swapped mine out for a 180 degree stat, so far so good. I know part of the reasoning for the manufacturers going to higher temps is emissions, I just don't like running a vehicle that hot, though I know it's engineered for it. It's possible that in the winter I may want to swap back to a 195 depending on how well it defrosts the windows in winter; but for now I'm happy.
The question I have is this something that may allow me to advance my timing a degree of two since the head temps are now a bit lower and will this help prevent pre-ignition to any usable amount? I guess, from a programming stand point, is there a benefit to having changed this?

Actually, I doubt there's any benefit at all. If, in fact, you ARE running a couple of degrees cooler, it's because you live where there are only two seasons: Winter and the 4th of July. I cannot see how that small a drop in engine temperature would allow you to advance your timing at all.

But, you now have a longer warm-up period which means you are running richer longer. This can lead to carbon fouling and possibly increased "washing" of lubrication from the cylinder walls.

Once your stat opens, your engine temperature will ultimately rise according to the load and the ambient temperature, so after everything stabilizes, you'll see very little difference from what you had with the 195 degree stat.

(And, I see Lars beat me to the punch - well, he's younger and quicker)!

- Jack