Power Hungry Performance Forum

Power Hungry Performance Forum (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/index.php)
-   1999 to 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Cody's 2000 F250 build. (http://forum.gopowerhungry.com/showthread.php?t=5475)

cleatus12r Mon, June 20th, 2011 11:06 AM

Click on the picture for a video of my last (and fastest run). Notice the lack of black smoke. Smokeless 360-370 HP.

http://i641.photobucket.com/albums/u...7at9305MPH.jpg

cleatus12r Mon, June 20th, 2011 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cj45lc (Post 48926)
That front end looks good on there Cody, good looking truck

Thanks, CJ. I think it looks "tougher" with the work truck front end.

As for the looks, it's a good "20-footer"; it looks good from 20 feet away. :hehe:

Robert6401 Mon, June 20th, 2011 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cleatus12r (Post 48928)
As for the looks, it's a good "20-footer"; it looks good from 20 feet away. :hehe:


I've seen a lot of women out here in TX like that. :drool2: :yikes2:

JK TX Folks.

jmt0645 Mon, June 20th, 2011 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert6401 (Post 48930)
I've seen a lot of women out here in TX like that. :drool2: :yikes2:

JK TX Folks.

it aint just in texas:hehe:

cj45lc Mon, June 20th, 2011 04:33 PM

I hear ya boys them 20 footers are everywhere...lol
being said by a probably 50 footer man

907DAVE Tue, June 21st, 2011 02:17 AM

Nice run Cody!

Get that 60' down and your in the 13's easy.

Are the "2's" just temporary, or is that what you are gonna stick with?

cleatus12r Tue, June 21st, 2011 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 907DAVE (Post 48972)
Nice run Cody!

Get that 60' down and your in the 13's easy.

Are the "2's" just temporary, or is that what you are gonna stick with?

The 2's will probably stay. I can't afford anything else....nor do I really want to spend any more money on all of the other things that go along with more fuel.

I drive it like a grandma anyhow. I don't see any need for more.

cj45lc Tue, June 21st, 2011 11:56 AM

I'm really impressed with the "smokeless" tune, that baby looks like it runs pretty good

cleatus12r Tue, June 21st, 2011 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cj45lc (Post 48991)
I'm really impressed with the "smokeless" tune,

The benefits of large nozzles.

Instead of injecting .16cc of fuel over 67 degrees of crank rotation at 2800 RPM (arbitrary number), it's possible to get the same amount of fuel in 50 degrees. This gives the fuel more time to burn completely before the exhaust valve opens.

I guess in the grand scheme of things though, that statement isn't entirely true. I only get about 2 milliseconds of actual "spray time" with my truck at the moment because my high pressure oil pump can't supply enough oil for more injector on-time (read: not really injecting the full capacity of fuel). The truck WILL smoke like a freight train (as evidenced in the first "all-out" dyno run I did with it) but it's horribly inefficient.

Lowdown89 Tue, June 21st, 2011 09:50 PM

When did y'all go to the track? We are thinking about coming down to run on a Friday night, be nice to get a few people together and go


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2024, Power Hungry Performance