![]() |
|
2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT 4.2L, 4.6L and 5.4L equipped F-150s and Mark-LTs. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() I'm quite certain they are "dampers" to reduce intake noise. If I'm right, they produce shock waves that cancel the ones that appear in the intake due to the inlet air flow. I doubt plugging them has had much effect except to make your intake louder. I left mine open, and, I think my intake noise is somewhat louder also, but not much. It's possible, quite probable really, that with a different intake area, you might need a different damper configuration. It might be instructive to block them one, two or three at a time in all seven (did I get that right?) combinations. I may try that if I get into a really experimental mood. I really don't think they have much of any effect on the air mass into the throttle body though, so I'd leave them open in the meantime. Oh, and I've painted my hose clamp too. I know that's added 30 HP and 25 ft-lbs of torque! ![]() ![]() ![]() - Jack |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well installed the streight pipe on my truck yesterday. Took about 1.5 hours sanding and fitting. I hope it makes things flow better, and give me a little more HP. This was a great idea. Cheap to..
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Okay...
I finally got the writeup in the FAQ section. ![]() F-150 Intake Snorkel Removal Thanks to all those who contributed. Keep those ideas coming so we can build a nice library of technical documentation. ![]() In regards to the Dyno testing of the snorkel, I've tested both the snorkel mod both with the replacement tube and just the open bellows with nearly identical results in both HP and AFR. This leads me to believe that turbulence that far upstream is not an issue in relation to either efficiency or MAF accuracy. It is certainly more stable than kits like the K&N which moves the MAF sensor mounting location 12" towards the air filter to end up about 6" away. Tell me that's not going to be affected by turbulence. :o Anyway, given the data I've compiled on the this modification, I'd sooner do this modification rather than spend money on a CAI.
__________________
Bill Cohron - The Mad Doctor ![]() ![]() ![]() Power Hungry Performance - The ORIGINAL in Ford performance tuning... Since 1997! (678) 890-1110 www.gopowerhungry.com - Home of the Hydra Chip, Minotaur Tuning Software, and the new Orion Reflash System for Navistar! Bring back ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Much to my surprise, I'm actually quite enjoying Linux! ![]() Last edited by Power Hungry; Thu, February 12th, 2009 at 11:34 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nicely edited, Bill!
![]() - Jack |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bill,
Thank you very much for publishing the information along with your insights, and giving it a home. I'm certain that this will help lots of people get a little more from their trucks without costing an arm and a leg. ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bill,
Thank you for publishing the mod and putting it where others and lurkers can find it easily. Thanks to everyone else for outstanding contributions and their great job. Also, I remembered something KISS. Won't let that go again! Lars
__________________
SENIOR MODERATOR--PTLA God doesn't have a Facebook but he's my friend. God doesn't have a twitter, but I follow him. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got a request in for a little flowbench time. I'll test the mod exactly as it's shown, versus the stock. I'll even try an AEM panel filter I have with it and a Brute Force intake as well. Should be a nice comparo
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jim, that is exactly the setup I am running with the AEM dryflo panel filter and the DWV intake mod. I am very curious to see the results. Thanks for taking the time to test this for everyone.
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 3 inch pipe is in what section of the store? I have never seen black PVC before?
|
![]() |
Tags |
dwv intake mod |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|