Power Hungry Performance Forum  

Go Back   Power Hungry Performance Forum > Ford F-150, Expedition, Navigator, Blackwood, Mark-LT, SVT Lightning and H-D Editions (Disabled) > 1997 to 2003 F-150

1997 to 2003 F-150
4.2L, 4.6L, and 5.4L equipped F-150s.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old Fri, September 18th, 2009, 01:23 PM
RobbyMartin RobbyMartin is offline
Bacon King
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 69
RobbyMartin is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordkindaguy View Post
I have an 02 4.6L and did notice some power gain but it could be because i also have a flowmaster cat back which allows a little better flow. The gryphon will tune your truck for the extra air amount coming in so it can put in more gas, more air+more gas= more fun

I like the more fun part but I really don't like the more gas I'll be using. I think I'll keek the stock intake and TB and sell off the aftermarket parts. I'm hearing good things about pulleys so I'm going to add those.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old Fri, September 18th, 2009, 01:41 PM
88Racing's Avatar
88Racing 88Racing is offline
SENIOR MODERATOR
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somewhere ....
Posts: 4,241
88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Just so there is no confusion. Intakes in my world are the part that bolts to the heads. Other people call them intake manifolds.
Now Cold Air Intakes that come before the TB, I and others just call them cai.
__________________
SENIOR MODERATOR--PTLA

God doesn't have a Facebook but he's my friend.
God doesn't have a twitter, but I follow him.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old Fri, September 18th, 2009, 02:32 PM
Jackpine's Avatar
Jackpine Jackpine is offline
PHP Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Among Elk, Deer and Javalinas on the Mogollon Rim in Aridzona
Posts: 3,243
Jackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to allJackpine is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobbyMartin View Post
I like the more fun part but I really don't like the more gas I'll be using. I think I'll keek the stock intake and TB and sell off the aftermarket parts. I'm hearing good things about pulleys so I'm going to add those.
I am 100% sure I got a gas mileage boost from doing the "gotts" style mod to the stock intake. I can't really explain why this should be except that possibly I get a better A/F mixture at near WOT which in turn gives me better power shortening the time I have to be in that state?

Anyway, I know before the intake mod, I could get 15.5 mpg at 55-60 mph. Anything faster and the mileage dropped. Now I get 15.5 at 70-75, and am above 16.0 at 55-60.

- Jack
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old Fri, September 18th, 2009, 04:08 PM
fordkindaguy's Avatar
fordkindaguy fordkindaguy is offline
Wanna go fast
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hilton Head Island, South Carolina
Posts: 72
fordkindaguy is on a distinguished road
Default

depends on how you drive, it only will pull in more gas if you're on wot otherwise i believe people are claiming higher gas mileage due to changing standard shift points and that good stuff
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old Sun, September 20th, 2009, 05:47 AM
Power Hungry's Avatar
Power Hungry Power Hungry is offline
The Godfather of Power Stroke Tuning
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 2,264
Power Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud of
Default

I didn't see if it was mentioned, but one thing that is a common problem is a moderately lean condition caused by using a CAI in conjunction with Programmer that wasn't set up for the inherent lean condition the CAI will normally cause. This results in poor throttle response and poor low RPM power. The canned tuning on the Gryphon will likely cause the same problems until you go with some custom tuning.
__________________
Bill Cohron - The Mad Doctor

Power Hungry Performance - The ORIGINAL in Ford performance tuning... Since 1997!
(678) 890-1110

www.gopowerhungry.com - Home of the Hydra Chip, Minotaur Tuning Software, and the new Orion Reflash System for Navistar!

Bring back Windows™ XP and 7.
Windows™ Vista and Windows™ 8 is a pain in my a$$!
Windows™ 10 is only slightly less annoying!
Windows™ 11 is garbage!

Much to my surprise, I'm actually quite enjoying Linux!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old Sun, September 20th, 2009, 07:29 AM
88Racing's Avatar
88Racing 88Racing is offline
SENIOR MODERATOR
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somewhere ....
Posts: 4,241
88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light88Racing is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Hungry View Post
I didn't see if it was mentioned, but one thing that is a common problem is a moderately lean condition caused by using a CAI in conjunction with Programmer that wasn't set up for the inherent lean condition the CAI will normally cause. This results in poor throttle response and poor low RPM power. The canned tuning on the Gryphon will likely cause the same problems until you go with some custom tuning.
I wasn't going to mention the "blanket response" for the cai being lean due to the year of vehicle. But it most definately could be possible. The other thing is a "small" vacuum leak.

To the OP does the idle dip when brakes applied?

Lars
__________________
SENIOR MODERATOR--PTLA

God doesn't have a Facebook but he's my friend.
God doesn't have a twitter, but I follow him.

Last edited by 88Racing; Sun, September 20th, 2009 at 07:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old Sun, September 20th, 2009, 12:23 PM
RobbyMartin RobbyMartin is offline
Bacon King
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 69
RobbyMartin is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 88Racing View Post
I wasn't going to mention the "blanket response" for the cai being lean due to the year of vehicle. But it most definately could be possible. The other thing is a "small" vacuum leak.

To the OP does the idle dip when brakes applied?

Lars

No idle dip at all. Normal idle in all situations.

I've heard before that CAI weren't good with programmers.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old Sun, September 20th, 2009, 12:37 PM
RobbyMartin RobbyMartin is offline
Bacon King
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 69
RobbyMartin is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Hungry View Post
I didn't see if it was mentioned, but one thing that is a common problem is a moderately lean condition caused by using a CAI in conjunction with Programmer that wasn't set up for the inherent lean condition the CAI will normally cause. This results in poor throttle response and poor low RPM power. The canned tuning on the Gryphon will likely cause the same problems until you go with some custom tuning.
Bill, I'm glad you responded. Thanks! I've heard before about the CAI/Programmer combo not working well. I have little low end/low RPM power. Power in the middle and higher RPM range is good for the 4.6L except the lag when it downshifts for passing.

Questions...I'm going to purchase the Gryphon but I'd like to know what would be best with a custom tune for my '02 4.6L. A Gotts intake mod or the Airaid intake I currently have installed? I live in HOT Southern California so I don't know if that makes a difference with your tunes. Stock TB or a BBK 75mm TB that I also currently have (not installed)? I'm also installing underdrive pulleys before I input to tune so also consider that.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old Tue, September 22nd, 2009, 11:37 AM
Power Hungry's Avatar
Power Hungry Power Hungry is offline
The Godfather of Power Stroke Tuning
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 2,264
Power Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud ofPower Hungry has much to be proud of
Default

On the F-150, the Gott's/Snorkel mod seems to work just as well as any commercial CAI kits. At least dyno results haven't indicated any appreciable difference. Not that there's really anything negative about the CAI so if you've got one already it's fine.

Newer trucks haven't seen any benefit to running a throttle body, but older trucks often see a moderate gain in mid to upper RPM performance in there area of about 5 to 8 HP.

Underdrive pulleys will require a small idle change (usually 50 RPM or so) to help keep the alternator charging correctly at idle.

In regards to air/fuel ratio and performance, peak torque and peak HP occur at different ratios with torque coming in about 11.25:1 to 11.6:1 and HP coming in around 12.25:1. If the fuel curves aren't correctly adjusted to meet the demands for the specific load/RPM, performance can suffer significantly.

I hope this makes sense.
__________________
Bill Cohron - The Mad Doctor

Power Hungry Performance - The ORIGINAL in Ford performance tuning... Since 1997!
(678) 890-1110

www.gopowerhungry.com - Home of the Hydra Chip, Minotaur Tuning Software, and the new Orion Reflash System for Navistar!

Bring back Windows™ XP and 7.
Windows™ Vista and Windows™ 8 is a pain in my a$$!
Windows™ 10 is only slightly less annoying!
Windows™ 11 is garbage!

Much to my surprise, I'm actually quite enjoying Linux!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old Tue, September 22nd, 2009, 05:05 PM
RobbyMartin RobbyMartin is offline
Bacon King
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 69
RobbyMartin is on a distinguished road
Default

In regards to air/fuel ratio and performance, peak torque and peak HP occur at different ratios with torque coming in about 11.25:1 to 11.6:1 and HP coming in around 12.25:1. If the fuel curves aren't correctly adjusted to meet the demands for the specific load/RPM, performance can suffer significantly.

I hope this makes sense.[/QUOTE]

This is the only part I didn't comprehend but not sure that I need to. I just want you to do your MAGIC so I can pop a wheelie...haha, just kidding.

Thanks for the input. I know what I'm going to do as far as the mods go .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 AM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2024, Power Hungry Performance