![]() |
|
2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT 4.2L, 4.6L and 5.4L equipped F-150s and Mark-LTs. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wonder if winterized gas is also playing apart in the dropped times?
__________________
SENIOR MODERATOR--PTLA God doesn't have a Facebook but he's my friend. God doesn't have a twitter, but I follow him. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In the cooler temperatures, you're getting TWO effects that contribute to power. BOTH the fuel and the air are colder, so they are somewhat more dense. This adds up to more energy per fuel/air charge in the cylinders, so, you should see better acceleration. You pay for it though in increased fuel consumption.
As an aside, this phenomena was VERY apparent in the planes I used to fly. In the winter, our jets would just "leap" off the ground (but you couldn't fly as far without refueling). In the hot Texas summers, the old T-33s that I got my basic training in would almost not make it off the ground before we ran out of runway. ![]() One of the preflight calculations you do is "takeoff distance". It needs to be less than the runway length or you don't go. And, a turbojet engine is really just a glorified diesel engine. (It will even burn diesel fuel - but it needs jet fuel for the anti-icing properties). - Jack
__________________
2024 F150 Platinum SCrew 3.5L PowerBoost FX4, Peragon Tonneau Cover, LineX Bed, 35% Window Tint on All Sides and Rear, Full Nose Paint Protection Film, Husky Mud Guards, Lasfit Floor Liners, VIOFO Dash Cam |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jack's got a good point. But I have also noticed that my truck runs different when they make the switch. I also remember Bill recommending to someone who was having trouble to run 91 tune even though there was 87 in the tank. Maybe they mix the winter stuff to resemble the higher grade fuels.
__________________
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I considered the obvious effect of the cooler air being denser, which is the very reason I wanted to see what improvement could be had.
Now if there is anyway to keep these temps during the summer, that would be a nice bonus. One note everyone should consider for winter roads. If you have your shift firmness all the way up, watch for a sudden loss of traction if you're accelerating hard. I have experienced it a couple times already, temps in the teens or lower + cold tires = wheel spin (and instant fish tailing ![]() Let's have a safe winter!
__________________
Current mods: AEM Bruteforce CAI, Magnaflow SI/DO, Gryphon-87 & 93 tunes, Harley head lamps, tinted windows, lower grille filler, and FX2 lower valance. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Here in Tucson, they used to blend in MTB? (or something like that) to reduce the Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions in the winter. Yes, it seemed to hurt mileage. I don't think they use that stuff anymore, since they found it had a cancer causing link, but they DO "oxygenate" the fuel with some additive. I don't think Bill was saying they actually blend winter fuels to resemble higher octane stuff, I think he just said that the colder overall temps reduced the volatility, which is really what octane is all about (how easily the fuel will "flash ignite"). High octane fuel is simply less "explosive", as is "cold" gas. Oh, and BlackSTX - GOOD post on winter traction! We don't want any of our members ending up nose into a tree! - Jack |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
well how are the runs now that winter is over. for me, here in south louisiana, it has already reached 85F. i received my programmer yesterday and did a few runs today with it.
best 0-60 was 9.12s. that was with 87T and WOT set to 5000rpm, WOT Fuel set to 1.8%, and Shift set to 25. best 1/4 mile was 16.5 sec at 85mph. that was 93P with settings same as above. i have 2008 SCrew. mods are Gryphon Programmer and K&N CAI. I also have 87 octane in the tank now. its 75% full, so i have to burn this tank and retest the 93P settings again. i am running canned tunes. i will get custom tunes as my mods change. i am looking into exhaust (headers and cat-back), elec. fans, and underdrive pullies. that should really let the engine breathe.
__________________
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Do you have the 5.4 and 4wd? You have a little bit heavier cab but even I run 16.1 every time on the 1/4 with highway (3.55) gears and plenty of weight for the brush guard and tool box type of stuff. I also have the 4.6L under the hood.
__________________
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
2005 Lariat 4x2 5.4l
I pulled an 6.5 second time once on level 3 canned tune when i first installed Edge EVO for 0/60 mile test. I then used custom level 3 tune (changed gear ratio and tire size to proper setting) and im constantly getting 7.4 - 7.8 seconds now.
Mods are as follows: K&N CAI JBA 1 5/8" shorty headers Magnaflow cat-back exhaust 2.5 inch 3.73 gears 265/60 R18 Michelin's 90,000 miles |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hope these resize automatically...
Best time was a 15.65 and that was with me editing my already custom tune... The Gryphon said I would run 15.1s, well, it lied. lol. A good .5-.7 secs off my actual runs. The last one I was going against my buddies 96 Z28. I was surprised I beat him in the 60' mark. I had 2.312 to his 2.331. The low end torque on these trucks are amazing! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|