![]() |
|
2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT 4.2L, 4.6L and 5.4L equipped F-150s and Mark-LTs. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's the deal in plain and simple English:
Ethanol is a STUPID idea. It's a fuel with a low (compared to REAL gas) energy potential and requires a more fuel-rich stoichiometric air/fuel ratio to run properly. It makes ZERO sense to use a fuel that costs as much as real gasoline but gives far less energy per gallon and requires more fuel to run right (read: less power and less fuel economy). Looking at the fuel from an octane standpoint offers nothing because the octane means nothing...except that it's less prone to self-ignite in the combustion chamber due to pressure. No more, no less. Octane IS NOT a basis on which to measure performance or fuel economy, nor is it an aspect of determining "quality" or "cleanliness". Not withstanding, it's a ridiculous idea to use a fuel that has been made from a product that can easily be used to put food on the table (RED MEAT!!) and which has been government subsidized for years with ZERO financial turn-around. In addition, it's far worse for the environment (just for the enviro-nazis out there) because, like new diesel trucks, burning MORE fuel in the same amount of time/miles is NOT more Earth-friendly regardless of what you can or can't see coming from the tailpipe. Skip on ethanol. It's crap (family-friendly term). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is a renewable fuel but takes too much land to work. Just wondered if a custom tune could take more advantage of the higher octane level with timing or something.
__________________
K&N drop in filter Gotts mod QTP cut out CTS Custom 87 tow tune |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The only times I've heard of it being better for performance is in high compression engines...and even for that purpose I hear mixed results from track and drag race engine builders. Some say it is as good as race fuel, others say it is trash.
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|