![]() |
|
2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT 4.2L, 4.6L and 5.4L equipped F-150s and Mark-LTs. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i'm currently running 33's and just swapped from 3.55LS to 4.56LS and the difference is night and day. acceleration is amazing and city milage i gain 1-2 mpg as i'm not having to put my foot in it as much, hwy (65-70) stayed the same, but anything over that speed it drops off. check ebay for the parts, i got mine from AZRACEPLACE for 215 shipped (2wd), they have 4wd sets for around 450. labor to install at my local shop was only 375 and took 2-3 hours
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And, as I said, the higher gear ratio has to reduce strain on the transmission. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sounds reasonable, especially for the transmission. I suspect the engine is operating at a reduced "load" too, so that would account for the lower CHT. I keep a fairly close eye on my CHT and TFT and as soon as I start climbing even a gentle slope (more engine load) the CHT goes up a bit. On downhill stretches, even if not coasting, because some gas is needed to overcome wind resistance and maintain speed, the CHT will go down.
I'm a bit surprised at the reduction in your CHT though. All these conversations almost make me want to regear my truck, since I tow with it. (You'd think though, that the factory tow package would have included optimized gearing.) ![]() - Jack |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm also thinking about a milder regear. I'm looking for 3.93's to replace the 3.55s. That way, if/when I get bigger tires I'll aready be good for 33s or so. Mine is 2wd so it makes things much cheaper.
__________________
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
SENIOR MODERATOR--PTLA God doesn't have a Facebook but he's my friend. God doesn't have a twitter, but I follow him. |
![]() |
|
|