Power Hungry Performance Forum  

Go Back   Power Hungry Performance Forum > Ford F-150, Expedition, Navigator, Blackwood, Mark-LT, SVT Lightning and H-D Editions (Disabled) > 2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT

2004 to 2008 F-150 and Mark-LT
4.2L, 4.6L and 5.4L equipped F-150s and Mark-LTs.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Mon, January 31st, 2011, 02:02 PM
ticopowell's Avatar
ticopowell ticopowell is offline
Grown-up in training!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Currently in Tampa FL
Posts: 863
ticopowell will become famous soon enough
Default

Haha well I am not the oldest or the youngest here(25), but I do think its great that we can all have fun joking about ourselves while learning stuff .
I just wanted to add a clarification to what I posted before, I am not interested in aftermarket MAF's, mine works fine and im never gonna have a monster machine that needs that much airflow. I was just pointing out that the diameter around the actual sensor stays the same on the CAI's that I have dealt with, therefor the fact that the rest of the pipes change wont have a huge effect on the reading.

also another thought... just because you arent getting a lean code doesnt mean that you arent running slightly lean... or the same with a rich code just my thoughts
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Mon, January 31st, 2011, 07:37 PM
Longshot270's Avatar
Longshot270 Longshot270 is offline
Forum Predator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,878
Longshot270 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ticopowell View Post
Haha well I am not the oldest or the youngest here(25), but I do think its great that we can all have fun joking about ourselves while learning stuff .
I just wanted to add a clarification to what I posted before, I am not interested in aftermarket MAF's, mine works fine and im never gonna have a monster machine that needs that much airflow. I was just pointing out that the diameter around the actual sensor stays the same on the CAI's that I have dealt with, therefor the fact that the rest of the pipes change wont have a huge effect on the reading.
Are you sure they weren't larger or a different shape around the sensor? If not then you aren't gaining anything running them besides the looks. You must consider your point of peak restriction as that will slow down air movement and change the absolute pressure from there to the cylinders.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Mon, January 31st, 2011, 07:48 PM
ticopowell's Avatar
ticopowell ticopowell is offline
Grown-up in training!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Currently in Tampa FL
Posts: 863
ticopowell will become famous soon enough
Default

It was the same diameter right next to the MAF, but it did remove other restrictions like in the fender, and it was a smoother path between the filter and the throttle body. Here is a good example of what I am saying about the CAI's I have dealt with. both were exactly this same idea.
the only think that I can think of that would affect airflow is that the air maybe be relatively faster or slower in that part of the tube versus what the stock tube would read. since this can affect that area without the MAF reading it (because like someone said the MAF covers only about 14% of the circle of air in question), that is why any adjustments would need to be made.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Mon, January 31st, 2011, 08:00 PM
Longshot270's Avatar
Longshot270 Longshot270 is offline
Forum Predator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,878
Longshot270 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ticopowell View Post
It was the same diameter right next to the MAF, but it did remove other restrictions like in the fender, and it was a smoother path between the filter and the throttle body. Here is a good example of what I am saying about the CAI's I have dealt with. both were exactly this same idea.
the only think that I can think of that would affect airflow is that the air maybe be relatively faster or slower in that part of the tube versus what the stock tube would read. since this can affect that area without the MAF reading it (because like someone said the MAF covers only about 14% of the circle of air in question), that is why any adjustments would need to be made.
Well if the inside diameter of the housing is the exact same as the stock housing then you should be fine. The pipe after it doesn't matter and the open filter before it only affects performance through air temps. The issue is not that the MAF only covers 14% of the cross section, the issue is the air speed through the cross section. You are not measuring the actual mass of air, you are measuring a part of the cross section to determine the rate at which air enters. From there you can calculate the overall rate and then the mass of air passing through. You dont measure flow rates of a river by channelling it into a big cup. You find an area that has uniform flow, measure the rate there and the rate at which water is moving through the area. Increasing pipe diameter with the same air consumption rates causes the airspeed to lower and tell the computer to fuel less.

We are dealing with vacuum rather than pressure so the concepts are much simpler.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Mon, January 31st, 2011, 08:55 PM
hampsterzone's Avatar
hampsterzone hampsterzone is offline
Come Get Some
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Grand Junction, CO
Posts: 135
hampsterzone is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm glad that I got the down low on everything from just about everyone. Makes since and I have learned a lot. I love being the first domino, Haha.
__________________
2nd place is 1st's loser!

2012 FX4 Waldoch M80 Edition Supercrew, 3.5L Ecoboost, Flowmaster Exhaust, K&N Air Filter, Road Armor Grill Guard, huge smile!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2024, Power Hungry Performance