Power Hungry Performance Forum  

Go Back   Power Hungry Performance Forum > Power Hungry Performance Product Information > Phoenix Switch-On-The-Fly Chip (DISCOUNTINUED) (Disabled)

Phoenix Switch-On-The-Fly Chip (DISCOUNTINUED) (Disabled)
Power Hungry no longer sells the Phoenix/TS chip, but if you need custom tuning we can recommend a few really good tuners that will be able to still provide tuning and support for your chip.

If you have any other questions or comments about the Phoenix/TS chip, please post it here.


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Wed, July 4th, 2012, 12:00 AM
INFRNL INFRNL is offline
Double Whopper
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 43
INFRNL is on a distinguished road
Default

I can assure you that upgraded injectors can have a significant impact on egts.
I recently fixed my excessive egts I was getting on DP tuner by replacing it with php chip. Could not get over 1100 deg wot empty.
Just added 250/100 injectors along with custom tunes and I can hit 1200 pretty easy now. Makes me almost wish I never did the injectors. Still not nearly as bad as egts when I had the DP, but not a whole lot better either. However I have a ton more power.

I am not sure what effects you would have with stage 1's though. Might just follow Cleatus's rec.
__________________
03 F350 7.3L Auto CC LB Dually 410's (LS Rear)
DP F5 w/guage style switch. NS,Stock,1200RPM high idle,60t,80e,120r
Nexus Guages (TT,FP,BP,EGT), 4"MBRP Exhaust. Coolant filtration system,203*stat and billet housing, AIH delete, HP X-Over line. (Baldwin PA2818) Bellowed up-pipes; TN Turbo(non-BB), BTS VB, In-Tank mods. RR FRx & Boots. 6.0Tranny Cooler
  #2  
Old Wed, July 4th, 2012, 12:27 AM
toad toad is offline
Whopper
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Millville Utah
Posts: 14
toad is on a distinguished road
Default

The last thing I want is problems. I think I might have to stay with what I have. Now what do I do with the grand I have stashed away. Hmm .500 smith and wesson
  #3  
Old Wed, July 4th, 2012, 09:53 AM
cleatus12r's Avatar
cleatus12r cleatus12r is offline
F Your Yankee Blue Jeans
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,665
cleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by INFRNL View Post
I can assure you that upgraded injectors can have a significant impact on egts.
Herein lies the problem....

I HATE the word "UPGRADE" because more often than not, the "upgrade" isn't much more than a headache or a total waste. I do not use that term for ANYTHING regarding aftermarket parts on a truck (heck, I don't use that word for anything, period because it bothers me so much). It's become such an overused term that means very little....

On a side note, my computer just reminded me of a Java Update that's now available; time to close that bubble and ignore it.

...anyway, it means very little because NOTHING that one can do to a truck is actually going to make it any better in every regard than the stock hardware. If you want more power, by all means install higher-capacity injectors and add larger nozzle orifices if you want to. However, to believe that the truck will run, drive, maintain EGT, or even get better fuel economy than stock is only proof that you're fooling yourself. The internet and it's wonderful forum communities have got every Tom, ****, and Harry thinking that "upgrading" is the only way to make the truck better or more useful. It couldn't be farther from the truth because in this instance, installing "upgraded" injectors is akin to willfully lighting one thousand dollars on fire and complaining about it the whole time.


Quote:
Originally Posted by INFRNL
I am not sure what effects you would have with stage 1's though. Might just follow Cleatus's rec.
He could buy the injectors if he wants to and not even change his tuning (stock or aftermarket). However, it will run and drive exactly as it does right now. AA code injectors are identical to AC (160/0%) injectors save for the increase in fuel capacity. If you're familiar with the HEUI injection system (or even just the "fuel side" of the injector), you know that there is a fixed capacity of fuel available per injection event. The AA code injectors' capacity is just over half of what the AC codes are capable of holding at one time depending on who you listen to (good ol' internet and the "facts" that are out there). If installing 160/0% (AC code) injectors into a 1995-1997 F-series without tuning, the injectors will only be commanded "on" long enough to inject the same amount of fuel as the stock AA injectors. If exhaust gas temperature is marginal now while towing, then it will be even hotter when more fuel is injected to make more power. Keep in mind though that the specific injector change you're considering won't inherently make the EGT higher.....but the tuning required to make the injectors a worthwhile investment will.

In closing, if your truck runs fine now (no injector problems), I wouldn't waste my money given the usage of your truck.
  #4  
Old Wed, July 4th, 2012, 03:11 PM
toad toad is offline
Whopper
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Millville Utah
Posts: 14
toad is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you for your help and more importantly your honesty.
  #5  
Old Thu, July 5th, 2012, 10:41 PM
TwinTurbo's Avatar
TwinTurbo TwinTurbo is offline
Stock Sucks!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mid-Western, MN
Posts: 57
TwinTurbo is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cleatus12r View Post
...anyway, it means very little because NOTHING that one can do to a truck is actually going to make it any better in every regard than the stock hardware.
I agree with you in this particular application about the injectors, however I would like to point out and have you clarify (as you've eluded to your dislike of upgrades, on more than one occasion), how "NOTHING" is better than stock hardware. The 6.0 powerstroke is the example I will use, but it is not limited to one manufacturer. The OEM's have all been know to cut corners to keep costs down or have there hands tied by emission regulations. How do you explain the EGR cooler failures and the "improved" aftermarket ones? Also the FICM reprograms and ECM rollbacks? Or something as simple as the intercooler hoses that were known to blow off? And that's just one engine, I'm sure we could go on and on, yes there are a lot of snake-oil products out there, but there are also many quality aftermarket products that, if not always better are at least equal to OEM's, for a fraction of the cost. The Agricultural market is just as bad, there are certain parts that come from the same manufacturer but cost twice as much from the dealer. So the price alone makes it better than stock hardware. Personally, when I see new equipment with problems and warranty work or repeated failures of of the same component it makes me wonder what else they overlooked or could have done better. Just to clarify I don't expect them to be perfect, things break, I get it, but you can't just blindly follow anything or anybody either, balance is key. Just a friendly rebuttal, -Cheers.
__________________
Put a Turbo on it!!!!

'95 F-250 Powerstroke, 350,000 Miles, Mods: Phoenix chip, 140V IDM, Diamond Eye DP to 4" straight pipe, CCV mod, Amsoil synthetics throughout.
'04 F-350, XLT Lariat, Powerstroke, CC, Dually, SS exhaust, AirRaid intake and filter, Edge Evolution, PHP FICM programmer.
  #6  
Old Thu, July 5th, 2012, 11:42 PM
cleatus12r's Avatar
cleatus12r cleatus12r is offline
F Your Yankee Blue Jeans
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,665
cleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinTurbo View Post
The 6.0 powerstroke is the example I will use
The 6.0L is garbage. It started out as garbage and will never be anything but garbage. I won't even look at one cross-eyed for fear it might blow a head gasket. That's why Bill does those.

Last edited by cleatus12r; Fri, July 6th, 2012 at 12:02 AM.
  #7  
Old Thu, July 5th, 2012, 11:56 PM
cleatus12r's Avatar
cleatus12r cleatus12r is offline
F Your Yankee Blue Jeans
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,665
cleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cleatus12r View Post
The 6.0L is garbage. It started out as garbage and will never be anything but garbage. I won't even look at one cross-eyed for fear it might blow a head gasket. That's why Bill does those.
I guess I should elaborate.

You're right. A lot of OEM stuff fails too due to the economics involved in producing a vehicle. However, a lot of these failures are also due to experimental periods when the EPA steps in and (for lack of a better term) messes up the whole deal. In addition, competition in the market also plays a role.

You used the 6.0L as an example. In International/Navistar trim, the VT365 was rated at a much lower horsepower level and was programmed to run significantly fewer RPM. Keep in mind that the medium-duty truck market wasn't as emissions-strangled at the time by our friends at the EPA so they weren't equipped with EGR at the time. You don't hear of too many failures with those trucks (at least the failures that were common to Ford F250/350 trucks). Ford stepped in and said, "We can make this engine turn 4000 RPM and make 320+ horsepower!!" All the while, the EPA mandated the usage of EGR on this engine since it was a light-duty truck.

Ford's adoption of the VT365 was completely EPA-mandated. Ford needed an engine to replace the T444E and the 6.0L was rushed to market with many shortcomings. Obviously, we see where that got us.......

Over the years, Ford has inundated it's customers with reflash after reflash after reflash; each subsequent reflash reduced power and made the engine less efficient. Unfortunately, this probably wasn't an EPA mandate, but an upper echelon call to reduce warranty work due to aggressive factory tuning that may have been causing head gasket and/or EGR cooler failures. Basically, Ford was trying to save money on warranty work.

Don't get me wrong. I worked as a GM technician for a decade and have been a professional automotive technician since 1999. I now work on heavy equipment and I have seen MANY, MANY failed factory attempts at making quality machines. My main beef is with the "requisite" parts that are constantly pushed on people to make their trucks "better", when, in fact, they're just throwing their money away.
  #8  
Old Fri, July 6th, 2012, 01:11 AM
INFRNL INFRNL is offline
Double Whopper
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 43
INFRNL is on a distinguished road
Default

I can agree with Cleatus's comment about trying to make my truck better, but I have actually thrown money away.

Cleatus, I'm am curious what your truck is and have you done anything to it?

If I started over, I would probably do gauges, php tunes, exhaust, and something to cure turbo surge. Oh, I would also do a Tamar style air filter or AIS. Everything else I have done, probably wasn't worth the money, with the exception of my BTS tranny. I better quit now
__________________
03 F350 7.3L Auto CC LB Dually 410's (LS Rear)
DP F5 w/guage style switch. NS,Stock,1200RPM high idle,60t,80e,120r
Nexus Guages (TT,FP,BP,EGT), 4"MBRP Exhaust. Coolant filtration system,203*stat and billet housing, AIH delete, HP X-Over line. (Baldwin PA2818) Bellowed up-pipes; TN Turbo(non-BB), BTS VB, In-Tank mods. RR FRx & Boots. 6.0Tranny Cooler
  #9  
Old Fri, July 6th, 2012, 12:45 PM
Highbeam Highbeam is offline
Whopper
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22
Highbeam is on a distinguished road
Default

Good thread for those of us that aren't drag racers. I hate to say the word but I have made some solid upgrades to my truck that I highly recommend.

The Ford AIS air intake system is a huge improvement in quality and filtration over the stock system that is known to fail.

The auxiliary transmission cooler allows me to use the truck as Ford intended. Even at stock power levels the stock trans fluid cooler is so small that the trans will overheat in normal conditions.

Neither of these added power but they were upgrades for reliability and dependability. I think it is too much to say that all changes from OEM are downgrades. I do understand your point though, that some mods are best left undone.
  #10  
Old Fri, July 6th, 2012, 12:54 PM
Dieselcat Dieselcat is offline
Whopper
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12
Dieselcat is on a distinguished road
Default

I have been waiting for a thread like this for awhile , though I thought
Cleatus would say "with tunes we can do anything!" Now that my
reality has been shattered what do you think about larger injectors just
to maximize the tunes you have. I know with my stock sticks I am only
getting 60 out of 80 on my daily driver. I was just thinking of stage 1
Injectors to help pull my trailer on a daily basis. My trailer is only 4I in weight.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 AM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2024, Power Hungry Performance