Power Hungry Performance Forum  

Go Back   Power Hungry Performance Forum > Ford Super Duty & Excursion > 1999 to 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel

1999 to 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
7.3L Power Stroke Diesel equipped Super Duty and Excursion.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Thu, September 8th, 2011, 04:22 PM
ChrisCNC ChrisCNC is offline
ChrisCNC_7.3L
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lebanon, OR
Posts: 33
ChrisCNC is on a distinguished road
Clap New Tunes

Nice!

I installed the tunes today, 80HP LT, 80HP DD, 100HP Performance and of course I had to drive the latter of the 3 right away

I drove up and over some local hills on a 20 mile loop. I averaged ~4mpg better than the equivalent Edge tune! The shifting seemed smoother as well as the power throughout the 0 - 70mph range (lots of corners on that loop). It won't take long with the fuel prices to have that one tune pay for all three. I'm excited to try the 80HP Daily Driver tune to see what gains I get (mpg) there. I'm sitting at 19+ mpg right now if the initial numbers are true, using the 100HP performance tune.

Needless to say, I'm happy as can be

Thank you PHP! Cody! Bill! Corey!

Sincerely,

Kevin
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Thu, September 8th, 2011, 10:21 PM
ticopowell's Avatar
ticopowell ticopowell is offline
Grown-up in training!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Currently in Tampa FL
Posts: 863
ticopowell will become famous soon enough
Default

That makes me happy to hear! for multiple reasons, mainly because I want that kind of mileage out of my truck, but also because you enjoyed the product , what mpg's did you originally get?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Fri, September 9th, 2011, 12:05 AM
cleatus12r's Avatar
cleatus12r cleatus12r is offline
F Your Yankee Blue Jeans
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,655
cleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to all
Default

Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you're looking at the overhead display, you are going to be disappointed when you figure out the mileage on paper.

Aftermarket tuning skews that reading pretty badly.
__________________
Tuning, flashing, burning chips, and repairing all aspects of 7.3L Powerstrokes.
SEVEN 7.3L-powered vehicles in the driveway. Two didn't come that way from the factory!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Fri, September 9th, 2011, 03:29 AM
dietoremain dietoremain is offline
Triple Whopper with Cheese
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 157
dietoremain is on a distinguished road
Default

agreed.. if you keep your foot out of it you can get better mileage though..
__________________
2002 7.3 F250 Supercab Shortbox
DIY intake
CCV dumped
Autometer gauges
WW/ATS 1.0 exhaust housing
Hutch/Harpoon in tank mods/hpX line
AIH delete/ebpv delete
TruCool trans cooler
Straight piped
PHP FU
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Fri, September 9th, 2011, 11:21 AM
ChrisCNC ChrisCNC is offline
ChrisCNC_7.3L
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lebanon, OR
Posts: 33
ChrisCNC is on a distinguished road
Default

I was using the Gryphon "EcoAvg" for comparison (the delta) to come up with ~4 mpg.

With the standard Edge Tow Safe (un-hitched) I was getting low 15's, with the Edge performance tune I was getting just under 16 (15.7 - 16.1) and the first indications with the 100hp performance I was getting 19.7. This is obviously a moving average of some kind since it is a little volatile but I thought that the delta's would be reasonably accurate. Not true Cody?
__________________
-Kevin

2003 F250 SD Crew, 7.3L, PHP Gryphon CTS, 5.5" Fabtech Lift, 20" KMC Spy, 315/60/R20 Toyo MT, Billet Grill, ATS Ported Shroud
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Fri, September 9th, 2011, 11:38 AM
ChrisCNC ChrisCNC is offline
ChrisCNC_7.3L
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lebanon, OR
Posts: 33
ChrisCNC is on a distinguished road
Default

True dietoremain!

On the CTS, there's a "Mileage Coach" option to show instantaneous mpgs vs avg mpgs. I've got mine showing the difference between the two, so it was fun seeing the mileage coach go to -18 when I nailed it coming up one of the hills around here (google claims it to be a max 23% grade...little easier in the truck than on my bike..).
__________________
-Kevin

2003 F250 SD Crew, 7.3L, PHP Gryphon CTS, 5.5" Fabtech Lift, 20" KMC Spy, 315/60/R20 Toyo MT, Billet Grill, ATS Ported Shroud
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Fri, September 9th, 2011, 01:13 PM
cleatus12r's Avatar
cleatus12r cleatus12r is offline
F Your Yankee Blue Jeans
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Montana
Posts: 2,655
cleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to allcleatus12r is a name known to all
Default

My advice is to run a few tanks through it keeping track of miles driven and gallons used. That's it.
__________________
Tuning, flashing, burning chips, and repairing all aspects of 7.3L Powerstrokes.
SEVEN 7.3L-powered vehicles in the driveway. Two didn't come that way from the factory!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Thu, December 8th, 2011, 05:00 PM
jaybuller jaybuller is offline
Whopper
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 11
jaybuller is on a distinguished road
Default WOW

my 01 excursion has the overhead display.... tha reads mpg. well with the edge juice with attidude on drive mode the overhead display would tell me i would average 19.9 mpg. that was reset when i filled my tank and then 350 miles later. when i filled up again i did the math and i actually only got 17 mpg. so i took the whole edge juice off the truck and the over head readout is back to normal reading about 16.9mpg. this is all withthe same 350 miles i drive for work every week. i filled up and with the truck with no tuning the over head said 16.9 and my actuall calculated mpg is 16.7mpg. so in stock form its pretty accurate. I just prdered a 6 pos chip from PHP so ill put it in there and drive the same 350 miles and report back what it does to the overhead display and the actuall mpg in the 65dd and then ill do a test in the 80dd.

if you get some actuall numbers from the manual calculation way i would be curious to see how much your overhead display or gryphon thingy is off.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Sat, December 10th, 2011, 11:18 AM
rammertide07 rammertide07 is offline
God & Guns
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rogersville, AL / Currently in Pollock, LA
Posts: 305
rammertide07 is on a distinguished road
Default

My daily drive to work is 60mi one way from the gas station. Sometimes in the morning I'll fill up my truck with the same pump at the same fill rate (first catch on the gas pump so it doesnt foam as much) and I top it off to the even dollar amount. I drove to and from work (120mi round trip) and topped off my truck again at the same pump with the same pumping rate...to get the same amount of fuel in there...ideally. I drive with the 140hp tune 95% of the time and my hand calculation was 16.9mpg which was the same as the OHD

ChrisCNC, is your truck 4x4 or 2x4?
__________________
01 F350 7.3 4x4 CC SRW/3.73/315-75-16/Aeroforce Interceptor/BD Thruster II/ Bellowed Up-Pipes/4" turbo back exhaust/CCV Mod/DIY 6637/FPR Shimmed to 65 PSI/TS chip reburned with PHP tunes (Stock, 40T WITH Whsiper tune, 80DD, 100R, 140Ex, 140SS)/Replaced and Cleaned EBPS & Tube 4-6-12/Zoodad mod/Recon smoked cab lights/MM Hubs/Cowl Hood/HPx
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Mon, December 12th, 2011, 09:42 AM
jaybuller jaybuller is offline
Whopper
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 11
jaybuller is on a distinguished road
Default wow

yours is the first ive seen with the ohd being right on... my gasser dodge is close but always off by about .3 or .4 mpg. ive got about 200 miles on this tank so far with the new php tunes in the 80hp dd mode so about another day or so and ill hit 350 again and go to the pump and see. so far the over head display is reading 18.7 mpg. it would be nice if its close to being on, that would be over 2 mpg difference over stock, but im not holding my breath, im thinkin probly only gettin 17mpg just judging on where the fuel needle is right now as compared to usuall.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.


All Contents Copyright 2008-2024, Power Hungry Performance