Quote:
Originally Posted by 88Racing
How conviniant that K+N just so happens to use the GM mass air flow for its testing.
|
Why would the car brand make any difference? The same K&N filter technology & same oil is used on all their filters...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 88Racing
Also their tests are biased due to that they performed them and did not have third party intervention.
I challenge you to find third party testing before you announce BUSTED!
|
As for 3rd party testing, how about the 107 supposedly defective sensors that were returned to them, 65 were totally fine! They sent the 23 malfunctioning ones to an
independent lab (3rd party) to examine and determine contaminants.
NONE had k&N oil on them. This is all from the first video link I provided earlier.
What about the millions of other filters they have sold over the years? Just think of how many millions of miles have been driven with their filters? How more unbiased a study do you want?
I have a technical background, I work in a lab, and I do a lot of testing according to standards. So I can appreciate when a company spends the time to do the R&D, with a dedicated test fixture, with annually calibrated instruments. You won't even find that at Mythbusters...
This myth is busted,
IMO
Fri, April 2nd, 2010, 02:03 PM
Threaded Mode